Posted on April 24, 2010.
Which is the difference between Scientology and the science of the church of spirit?Scientology is the church of the rich one in uber and the wackos, the spirit science is more normal
No, they are the two concepts of wacko.
The old one is a worship.
The last one... never heard about him. The source (the sources) :
Http: //Theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com..
Http: //xenu. net
Scientology is the creation of a writer of fiction.
The science is a knowledge branch base on the proof.
The this is without any not true doubt that Scientology is the church of the rich one in uber. I was in him during years. Most of the just people scratch there inside to obtain by. Most of to tend to be small owners of matters. The party of the reason ils're not rich is that the church has constantly his hand out for more and more of money. A something else is that a lot of people that obtain in the this were does not import what but rich to begin with.
Il's itself interesting how many people here to indicate fingers of how the a church is superior to the other. To do it facing, the two are started with the people that felt that they could take other ologies and isms and add ideas of their clean one and create something better. This is almost how ALL religions and philosophies begin.
Scientology was preceded by Dianetics and principally was borrowed of /influenced by early psychoanalyzes it. Il's of past traumatisms and the decisions did them. As SOM, it did not begin out as a church.
The teaching of RS/SOM incorporates generally idealistic and the philosophies of panentheistic. RS/SOM sign that all beings are expressions of and the party of Infinite Intelligence, also known as the Spirit, Christ Conscience, or God. It sign that, because God is all there is in the universe (not present just in the Sky, or in the assigned divinities, as believed by the traditional teachings),
Dianetics and Scientology leave almost God of the equation. We believe that the spirit is infinite and eternal and that this is what is meant by God but we mettons't adoration or obtains in the thing of entire god.
A something else that they have in common is that they the two were started with some guy in the first one to the mi-vingtia¨me century. Every was started with someone that thought that the spirit and the potential interior and scientifically could be realized could be approached. I think not not more of them arrived thereto. I think that the conviction between without any doubts the picture with the two of these ologies.
I mets't knows Church of Religious Science, but I know that the Church of Scientology is problematic and cultic. The ex-direction personnel left very and goes recently the public with the abuses. If you want really to read something of opening of eye, go to the ex-adepte of the scientologie's counsel of message.
Nevertheless, not all Followers of Scientology are in the Church of Scientology. There is completely little of us (yes, I said " us") that practical Scn and Dianetics outside the worship. To us, il's not a swindle, il's not all of the spatial foreigners, and il's not cultic for us.
Two completely different philosophies and practices.
Scientology does not leave God of the " equation", er Voltaire Duveteux's Child.
The dynamic eighth, that while looking at all eight dynamics as concentric cirlces, the one in the other, is the exterior or dynamic circle. It surrounds all.
A dynamics is pushed it or the craving to survive as or by.
These, for are
1. Oneself
2. The one) the family and the b) the sex act
3. Groups
4. Humanity
5. Life (the Plants and the animals for example)
6. The question, the Energy, the Space and Stopwatch (invented MEST)
7. The spirit (we, not the body, the party that is immortal)
8. God or the Creator. The source (the sources) :
Http: //www.scientology.org
