Postmodern Church

If you examined the better salesman enumerates recently you could have noticed two new books that defend the atheism cause. The one is by the English, Richard Dawkins and the other, entitled "the Letter to a Christian Nation" is by the American, Sam Harris.

I did not give the title of book of Dawkins because the title himself is a declaration blasphemer. Dawkins, Harris and the other authors of atheistic one including Christopher Hitchens forms the avant-garde of a new militarisme of atheistic one.

Dawkins also was quoted saying as Christian has not right for student their children as Christians. The this is a new evident assault on our faith. This new one to jump atheistic enthusiasm is really a form of secular fundamentalism.

I define a fondamentaliste as whoever deeply is committed to the to the basic or basic doctrines of his or his faith. I consider myself a Christian fondamentaliste.

The atheistic fondamentalistes deeply are committed to the conviction that life formed by the accidental collisions of atoms and the death causes the conscience end. Not thing astonishing, they deeply are committed to the evolution as an origin explanation.

This reminds of me a time when Thomas Huxley (1825 - 1895) in England and Green Robert Ingersoll (1833 - 1899) promoted to the United States the evolution and the Darwinian atheisms. The evolution is the myth of origins of atheism. The evolution teaching in the private schools caused a lot of young to kiss the atheism.

To allow me to give to a sketch of nail of the thumb of the history of philosophy to give you a context idea in which the new atheistic ones work. For the almost period of 2,000 years of Socrates (470 - 399 before J c) to Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650) the accent in philosophy was on the metaphysical one that is defined as the philosophy of ultimate causes and the ultimate reality beyond the world of physical direction.

The metaphysical one closely was linked to theology. Plato, with his doctrine of the "the indifferent mover" and the big medieval philosophers all respectful God considered as the point of departure or the thought basis. Descartes did to enter a major change far of the metaphysical one to an accent on epistemology.

Epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or how we can be certain of what we know. Descartes brought also raises it modern philosophy in which it is asserted that the truth is known or is discovered by the human intellect and not given by the revelation (the Bible).

The modern philosophers thought that an ideal system of absolute moral values could be discovered by the human reason and this would provoke a perfect world. They refused old wisdom given by God in the Bible.

THE modernisme was very limited under Descartes but increased little by little to David Smells (1711 - 1776) and the philosophers of Enlightenment brought the empiricism to the high prominence. The empiricism is the idea that the knowledge comes only by the direction.

The nineteenth century brought us Darwin and his idea that the humans brought down of the monkeys. This brought a major change to the anthropology that is the philosophy of what it means to be the human.

The rejection of God and of morality of God because of Darwinism brought the increase of communism and of fascisme as the atheistic political philosophies. (Although the nazisme was technically a system of occultic it heavily was influenced by the evolution theories racial based).

The massive murders that arrived under Hitler, Staline and Mao caused a pessimisme and a radical nihilisme under John Paul Sartre and Albert Camus. The pessimisme was the result on account of the fact that 300 years of modern philosophy had not for result discovered it of a system of absolute morales that could unite the world in peace. The absolute morals are morals that apply to all people through all cultures.

The two World War and the massive murders under communism caused such pessimisme that it became fashionable among the philosophers to refuse the human reason completely. This was a rejection of modern philosophy and the introduction of philosophy postmoderne.

Postmodernism tries to refuse and transcend the reason. The this is an idea rejection that the absolute truth is given by the revelation (the Bible) or discovered by the human reason.

Postmodernism is the idea that the truth and the morals are not absolute but are created by individual every human. This is called relativism. The this is a rejection of all moral systems that are absolute. They claim that no moral rules apply to all people through all cultures.

Postmodernism is a radical change to the narcissism as the basis for all investigation and all human pleasure. Narcissism means simply likes automatically. The concept postmoderne of the east automatically a radical concept of magnet automatically and oneself confidence.

This new one likes automatically is the context in which the atheistic new ones work. They went beyond the pessimisme of second World War of post to a new optimism base on radical individualist oneself confidence.

The new atheistic one are secured closely in the promotion of relativism postmoderne. They claim to promote liberty while liberating the old manilas. As a lot of knows you that I debate atheistic on a group of debate e-mail called the Credation_l'edvolution_le debates.

The impoliteness and the condescending verbal assaults of the evolutionists of atheistic one in the group of debate e-mail terrorize! An evolutionist insulted if I did not decide even to open its e-mail more. I left its e-mail closed and replied to the other debaters.

Even the moderating one of the group if was disgusted with a debater that it excluded from it the group only to have the returned many and many times under 16 different screennames!

Despite him all I continue to debate and I believe that I obtain by to the because they change their arguments and give progressively other proofs that they begin seeing the defects of a universe without reason.

I do not do certainly a fanatical complaint that all atheistic ones are incorrigibly impolite. I say this despite the Fact that most of the atheistic ones I treated or saw in the media seems to be extremely abrasive. I guess the a that not "goes out" is a transverse cutting of atheistic ones as a body.

I will say that the vision of the world of atheistic one gives the true no philosophical shore for the morality. As Dostoevsky wrote: "If there is not God, All things are acceptable".

The vision of the world of atheistic one allows the impoliteness, pollute the language and all kinds of incorrect behavior. Any number of individual atheistic ones can or cannot choose to do that their world vision allows.

As the evolution and his implicit atheism are taught in the taxpayer schools subsidized it caused corporation secularization. The schools are a lot ragged people and mannered sick with no moral compass, directed only by their basis, their animal appetites.

The moral capital developed on the generations when the people learned the Bible to the house and to the school and to the church is spent and this capital more moral, More christian and more valid needs to be filled.