Church Letterhead

Http: //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23155264/...

And does the separation of church and declare?

Themselves they are a political entity, shouldn't they are taxed as the one?

Well, qui's it not at all entire. You have anti-cheerful, the churches of pro homophobia that want to endorse laws of candidates and passes that reflect their religious convictions. Themselves they want the special right to be political, nevertheless not the taxes of salary. I think that any church that engages in these activities should be just taxed as the remainder of taxed us.

Yes, the synagogues, mezquites and the Protestant temples also.


OBAMA: you are not black! !!!
Yu is Mulatto! !!! As Cubans, Dominican, Haitian, and Hispanic-american other.

Funny.

I has not any problem with the churches endorsing does not import that does or do I feel that they should be taxed.

Why you to do?

No, everyone has a right to their own opinion.

THE CHURCHES THAT TAKE A DETACHE OF WOOD OF POSITION THEIR IMPOT EXEMPT STTAUS.

YES

Probably doubles taxed if the enspouses of church ideas radical of several knowledge racists as farrakhan

The signs indicate to yes, the churches are the biggest tear, tax the magnet all the others

The response is 'THERE' but not for the reason vous've declared. It was once, before we have lived in the State of Police of International socialist Well-being, the 'Church(s) (Church(s))' taught people that is were wrong to fly and kill and if you went to the church or the church tried to convert you, it checked which is now 'welfare'. Now, of course, the doesn of edglise't does these things and should lose their 'tax exempts' statute because of him. The hell, we could do go out probably the national debt of income compla¨t of single Catholic Church! The source (the sources) : I mean really, God doesn't needs money, just?

If a church endorses a special candidate they risk losing their exempted statute of tax. Most of the churches that je've known encourages just of the people to vote and use their better own judgement on that to vote for.

The separation of means of the state that the government will remain of the religion. ...not that the religion will remain of the government

I think the minister, the priest, iman, or the rabbi that lowers to sprawl itself in the mud of political one does a bad service to his own religion, his congregation, his synagogue or his mosque.,

Why?

I mean, we mettons't tax political parties. Why should we treat different churches?

A lot of interests groups special marry agree political -- the ACLU, the NRA, the NOW, the NAACP -- they mettent't taxes of salary.

Why shouldn't a church is allowed doing something that these others group can do?

The churches should be counted to follow the same rules as other to non lucrative goal when it is a matter of the political approvals (that is the current law).

I have gagned't asks even my minister that it has the intention to vote for, just to avoid putting him in a left position.

I was under the impression that his did not be anxious the account of a religious establishment to endorse a candidate. Themselves they they do fiscal detached exemptions. Which does me me to wonder how Jerry Falwell and the medga churches do it?

The IRS and congress already addressed the problem. The source (the sources) : http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,i...

Some negligent churches the jar-of-wine of IRS for their silence and speak out politically.
I think that the churches should be taxed.
To show me where " Seperation of church and of state" is in the constitution.
Je'll shows you where the Founders wanted to prevent any " religious institution" as Catholicism to resume the government...

The churches are the tax exempts as the churches; themselves they become the groups of political plea they lose their tax exempts the statute.

I question the statute of a lot of our "churches." Is Pat Robertson a true minister? Is Dobson' s Home on the Family does not import what but a call to the arms for the hate-filled one? The home is one to non lucrative goal 501(c)(3) organization. Considering Dobson's behavior, do they deserve to continue to hold this designation?

If it waddles of the and the this of charlatans is a duck and the ducks should be taxed.

I am against fiscal exemption for all churches. But since cela's not going to arrive. .........Yes, absolutely, the churches that align themselves politically should be taxed without the question.