Church History In Plain Language

For a short response, maybe a classification of percentage, as 20% malrepredsentation (80% right), with a reason?

For a longer response, read the to follow and say that you think if you have the time:

Je've was to examine the history surrounding life and the teaching of Jesus. A number of years there is I came to the point where I realized that the teaching of Jesus -his application- is unaware of principally in Christianity. I decided that my faith and my comprehension of him should be based on his teaching, and I wondered why this was not the case. If I began examining how Christianity developed between the time of Jesus and the formation of the first Catholic Church, and I I pense've discovered very interesting something.

We have accounts of Jesus' life and the teaching, and these came from the people that had access first to transmit the news; the news that was gone through the original supporters of Jesus. These accounts came from the just source. But we have also a general understanding Jesus; a framework, that says us which faith in him is a question of. And this comprehension could not have come from the just source.

The comprehension of Jesus held by its original implied supporters hearing its words and putting them in the practice; applying his teaching to their lives.

We have a comprehension of Jesus that does living by his optional teachingae¦ uselessae¦ even hazardous to the duty of good day to lack faith in the grace of God.

Jesus' the teaching is recognized in Christianity, and applied in the various manners, but when it is an application matter practices -notably in the consideration to the things that it said money, the possessions, the life method- directs the response to the simple language is a very unpopular idea. It can in fact is seen as in contrast to solid Christian faith.

But, for those that believes in him, Jesus said;
&Quot; if you are anxious my teaching that you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will regulate liberates you. " John8:31
&Quot;...everyone that hears these words of expression and the placement in the practice is as a wise man that constructed his house on the boulder. " Tangle 7:24
"Whoever has my orders and obeys them, it is the the one that likes me". John 14:21
"It that does not like will obey me my teaching". John 14:24

It seems there to have a pip in the comprehension of Christian of Jesus. Can this comprehension came from the bad source?

When you look at the first documents of century there is a question that begs to be replied: What did it arrive to the disciples of Jesus? Outside of the report explaining given in the acts, and the curious piece of very isolated information data by the church fathers, we know nothing of their later lives. The most first church generates the complaint to have known them, but there is not impressive proof for this complaint. In which communities were they implied? Who did know them really?

There principally are two groups of people represented in the New Testament: The Jews, and the kind ones (non-Jews). The original supporters of Jesus were Jewish, and they were known as Nazarenes. The history that was given us about the growth of pile of Christianity believing Jewish and kind in a group. It supposes a faith line, a movement, that was at first Jewish, but became a religion completely of the kind ones in some generations. This is seen as a natural transition because of the rejection of Jesus by Jews.

So when we look at behind on the Christian origins, we climb back up until the origin of by the history of a movement of church of the kind ones. We read documents that were not written by Jews. We read documents that contain a lot of feelings Anti-jew.

The this is a history that cheats very. There were a lot of Jews that believed in Jesus in the first century, and they Jews remained the most probable ones. The references to their fading one after the first century is few, but a very significant movement of Jews that believed in Jesus clearly existed even to end of the fourth century. And they were distinct of the churches of the kind ones. Instead of a principal line of faith, the proof is there to say there was two. And if there was two, we can or could not have received our comprehension of Jesus of the people that knew for him, and were called to be its witnesses.

If I believe that the accounts that we have Jesus are authentic, and if I believe in him, then I need knowledge that my faith is constructed on just foundation, that is Jesus, his teaching, put in the practice. When Jesus talked about the wise man that constructed his house on the boulder, it said the dug man down below deeply to arrive to the boulder. That means the equipment excavation that shouldn't is used for foundation -the things that nous're inclined to want to construct on... the things that we taught to construct onae¦

If you want to examine this ampler, and see the proof in the primary documents, go to the site internet following:
www.wasjesusachristian.com

Christ not itself anything wrote... nevertheless its words and the actions are recorded by the so honest and reliable witnesses as never put the pen to decorate. (PHILIP SCHAFF - the History of the Christian Church)
But the men and the devilish seductive ones will polish of worse one in worse, cheat, and is cheated.
2 Tim 3:13 (KJV)
I read all your question. This not to be easy to reply. Can I post this question on my site internet? Http: //Asolitaryplaceonline.com. com.
Je'll furnishes a blog of anwser with the question.
If if please to give me your permission. my e-mail is the Source of david@asolitaryplaceonline.com (the Sources) : PHILIP SCHAFF- the History of the Christian Church
The holy Bible (KJV)

The source (the sources) : PHILIP SCHAFF- the History of the Christian Church
The holy Bible (KJV)

the better source of information comes from Revelation 2 & 3

Ouais, and where did it obtain them the baby eyes blue?
...
I didn't read any of that, sorry je'm...

The church declaring distorted Jesus Christ to the full range. 100%
The true church, those that obey Jesus, they mettent't distorts it to all.

Forget your percentages, for they are simply a manipulation of numbers. ...........All accountant knows this.

The church distorts Christ in says that It everyone likes and all forgives.


Does Met't believe me? Walk the exterior one of your zone of comfort and TO HAVE READ the Bible. Jesus did not do " hang around with" the sinners. .............He went with the intention to convert the. In ALL things, Jesus, supported the wishes and the orders of His Father. .........................

I did not read all your additional details if I will jump just your first question.

I believe that the malrepredsentation is a defined one and there is not or, or the percentage of. Jesus said;

(John 8:31) 31 And if Jesus continued to say to the Jews that had believed for him: "If YOU remain in my word, YOU are really my disciples. . .
............
Hereby can see us that to deviate would be the opposite of " my disciples". I believe that the Bible is net and should be aligned to a Christian true service methods to God. I know that there is the a lot of controversies on which things mean in the Bible but, the Bible should not contradict and this is how we can define the direction of different things.

To not only the principal Churches deviated pure words of the Bible but also a lot of others that claim to be Christian. Nevertheless Christ is the just manner, but the faith that uses the Bible as it is not meant to be understood appears to right to a lot.

All the better one with that

define the church, Jesus constructed only the a church, built the one on the boulder, not the sand

provided that the lord was reconised as the lord as the it was the lord that manages to transfer Jesus to the other monde's if it could be paid attention to the time of fist it was put a counsel an arkmanra, then it had the end his apprentaship, then it was return on board by the rear lord to were it could be taught in the manner of ARKMANRA again, could fly it the Source (the Sources) : God Allmighty and David